The Unhealed Fracture: Caste, the Social Psyche, and the Performance of Hierarchy in Contemporary India.
Title: The Unhealed Fracture: Caste, the Social Psyche, and the Performance of Hierarchy in Contemporary India.
Author: Dr. Shekhar and Team
Affiliation: Psychology Doctor's Forum for All 🏥⚖️
Abstract
Caste is not a relic. It is a living architecture of the mind, a structure of feeling and cognition that persists even when the law declares it dead. This article examines the social behaviour of Indians with respect to caste in the contemporary era, drawing on empirical research published between 2000 and September 2026. The evidence reveals a paradox. Caste is everywhere and nowhere. It is performed through subtle acts of deference—what one LSE study calls maryada—by individuals who do not consciously endorse hierarchy, driven not by belief but by the fear of social scrutiny and the prospect of sanctions directed at their families. It operates as a "deeply ingrained moral and psychological framework" within universities, producing shame, fear, and internalised inferiority in Dalit students while remaining invisible to upper-caste peers and faculty. It shapes cooperation in laboratory experiments, where low-caste participants contribute less when their identity is made salient, consistent with the constraining weight of negative stereotypes. It reproduces inequality through the most intimate of mechanisms: outgroup favoritism, where low-caste workers preferentially help high-caste colleagues, thereby reinforcing the very hierarchy that excludes them. And it kills—through the chronic psychological trauma of discrimination, which drives rates of anxiety, depression, and self-harm sharply upward among Dalits. The article argues that caste survives not because people believe in it, but because the social architecture makes it costly to disobey. The performance of hierarchy is a survival strategy in a world where the sanctions for transgression are real and the rewards for conformity are tangible. We do not have a problem with anyone. But data is data, and truth is truth.
Keywords: caste, social behaviour, maryada, social identity, everyday discrimination, Dalit mental health, outgroup favoritism, stereotype content model, structural violence
1. Introduction
A young man enters a university. He has secured the first rank in the entrance examination. He has worked for this moment for years, through nights of exhaustion and days of quiet desperation. He expects recognition. He expects, perhaps, a small measure of respect. Instead, he is met with silence. With sideways glances. With casual remarks that erode his achievement grain by grain. "How," the glances seem to ask, "could a Dalit student top the examination?" His merit is not celebrated. It is treated as an anomaly, something that requires explanation, something that must be dismantled before it can be believed.
This is not the nineteenth century. This is not a village in the hinterland. This is a premier university in a modern, globalising nation. And this is the reality of caste in contemporary India. It is not a matter of law. The law is clear. It is not a matter of belief. Many who perform caste do not believe in it. It is a matter of the mind—a psychological architecture so deeply embedded that it operates below the threshold of conscious awareness, shaping behaviour even when the behaviour contradicts the stated values of the actor.
This article examines the social behaviour of Indians with respect to caste. It asks three questions. What are the mechanisms through which caste is performed in everyday life? What are the psychological consequences for those who bear its weight? And what does the empirical research from 2000 to 2026 actually show?
The argument is not that India is a caste-ridden society. That is a truism. The argument is that the persistence of caste is not primarily a matter of ideology. It is a matter of social mechanics. It persists because the cost of transgression is high and the reward for conformity is real. It persists because the mind has been trained, through generations of repetition, to perform hierarchy even when the heart no longer believes. We do not have a problem with anyone. But data is data, and truth is truth.
2. Method
2.1 Search Strategy
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Shodhganga. The search covered publications from January 2000 to September 2026. Keywords included: "caste social behaviour India," "everyday discrimination caste," "maryada hierarchy performance," "Dalit mental health," "caste stereotypes," "outgroup favoritism caste," "inter-caste cooperation," "caste university experiences," and combinations thereof.
2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Studies were included if they: (a) examined social behaviour, cognition, or interaction in relation to caste in India; (b) employed experimental, ethnographic, survey, or mixed-methods designs; (c) reported outcomes related to hierarchy performance, discrimination, cooperation, or mental health; and (d) were published in peer-reviewed journals or as scholarly theses. Studies were excluded if they were purely theoretical without empirical grounding or focused exclusively on historical caste dynamics without contemporary relevance.
2.3 Data Extraction and Synthesis
Data were extracted on study design, sample characteristics, behavioural or psychological measures, and key findings. A narrative synthesis approach was employed.
3. Results
3.1 The Performance of Hierarchy: Maryada and the Fear of Sanctions
The most striking finding in the contemporary literature on caste is the disjunction between belief and behaviour. A 2023 doctoral thesis at the London School of Economics, based on survey data from 6,122 Indians, 34 in-depth interviews, and an online experiment with 612 participants, examined how young Indians navigate and reproduce caste hierarchies. The findings were unambiguous. Social hierarchies are performed through maryada—subtle acts of deference along intersecting lines of caste and gender—even when the individuals performing them do not consciously endorse hierarchy-relevant norms. The driver is not belief. It is social scrutiny. "It is the type of social scrutiny within a setting, coupled with the prospect of sanctions and reputational harm, that compels the performance of maryada". And crucially, "a concern for family obligation and the expectation of sanctions directed at the family, not just the individual, are essential components in understanding the performance of maryada".
This is a cognitive architecture of conformity. The individual does not act out of conviction. They act out of calculation. The calculation is not even conscious. It is the automatic response of a mind that has learned, through years of observation, that transgression carries costs that extend beyond the self. The family is the hostage. The reputation is the currency. And the performance of caste is the price of belonging.
3.2 The University as a Site of Caste Mentality
The university is supposed to be a meritocracy. It is supposed to be a space where achievement is rewarded and ascription is left at the gate. The research shows otherwise. A 2026 study in National Identities, based on ethnographic fieldwork in Odisha, describes caste as "a deeply ingrained moral and psychological framework within Indian universities, shaping interactions, perceptions, and hierarchies". The study documents the "shame, fear, and marginalisation" of Dalit students, and how "upper-caste mentalities produce internalised inferiority and reinforce social otherness".
The mechanism is not overt discrimination. It is the subtle, everyday erosion of merit. The Dalit student who tops the entrance examination is met not with celebration but with "quiet unease". His success "provoked an unspoken disbelief". Through "casual remarks, silences, and sideways glances," his merit is "slowly eroded". The study concludes that "academic success does not free Dalit students from caste and cast(ed) prabruti; it often makes them more visible to" the very forces that seek to diminish them.
This is a psychological violence that operates through the micro-interactions of daily life. It is not the violence of the lynch mob. It is the violence of the raised eyebrow, the withheld congratulation, the assumption of fraudulence. It is the violence that says, without saying: you do not belong here, and your presence is an offence against the natural order.
3.3 The Mental Health Toll: Chronic Trauma and Self-Harm
The psychological consequences are severe and measurable. A 2025 study in Contemporary South Asia, based on a mixed-method design with 250 Dalit students, 10 case studies, and 5 focus group discussions in a university in Odisha, examined the mental health and self-harm experiences of Dalit students. The findings were stark. "Societal bias, stigma, discrimination, untouchability and a pervasive sense of 'unseeability' within the university environment plays a significant role in fostering despair and self-harm".
The mechanism is chronic stress. Caste discrimination "inflicts a form of chronic psychological trauma, driving rates of anxiety and depression sharply upward among the most marginalised communities". The trauma is not an event. It is a condition. It is the cumulative weight of a thousand small humiliations, a thousand moments of being seen as less than, a thousand reminders that one's presence is a problem to be solved rather than a person to be welcomed. The body keeps the score. The mind breaks under the weight.
3.4 The Psychology of the Stereotype: Ambivalence and Karmic Justification
The stereotypes that sustain caste are not simple. They are ambivalent, mixing warmth and competence in ways that justify the status quo. A 2024 study in the Journal of Social Psychology, applying the Stereotype Content Model to caste in India, found "the presence of more ambivalent stereotypes and higher belief in karmic ideology in the four southern states compared to the northern states". The belief in karma provides a cognitive framework that makes hierarchy seem just. The suffering of the low-caste is not an injustice. It is a consequence of past deeds. It is deserved. It is cosmic.
This is a cognitive architecture of legitimation. It does not require hatred. It requires only a belief in a just world—a world where people get what they deserve. And that belief, once established, makes compassion unnecessary and resistance futile.
3.5 Cooperation and the Weight of Identity
The laboratory evidence confirms the power of caste identity to shape behaviour. A 2022 preregistered experiment in the Asian Journal of Social Psychology examined the influence of caste-based identity on cooperation using a Prisoner's Dilemma with 685 Indian participants. The findings were nuanced. The partner's caste group membership—whether ingroup or outgroup—did not significantly influence cooperation. But a more subtle pattern emerged. "Participants from the general caste [were] more cooperative when paired with (hypothetical) backward caste others (outgroup), compared to backward caste participants when paired with (hypothetical) general caste participants". The difference disappeared once demographic characteristics were controlled, but the direction is telling. The low-caste participant, when facing a high-caste partner, is less cooperative. Not because of hatred. Because of the weight of history. Because of the expectation of exclusion. Because of the internalised belief that cooperation will not be reciprocated.
A 2026 dissertation from the United Nations University provides further evidence. In lab-in-the-field experiments with high- and low-status caste groups in rural India, the research found that "low-caste participants cooperate less than high-caste participants when identity is salient, consistent with the constraining effect of negative stereotypes". But the research also found hope. "Role-model priming raises contributions—especially among low-caste participants—and narrows the caste-gap". The architecture is not fixed. It can be shifted. The mere presence of a positive exemplar can loosen the grip of the stereotype.
3.6 Outgroup Favoritism: The Internalisation of Hierarchy
Perhaps the most disturbing finding in the contemporary literature is the phenomenon of outgroup favoritism among low-caste individuals. A 2023 study in the Academy of Management Proceedings, based on a large multi-source field study of 100 work teams and their supervisors, examined helping behaviour in mixed-caste workplaces. The findings were counterintuitive. "The level of endorsement of societal inequality will be higher among low (vs. high) caste members, leading them to preferentially allocate help to high caste coworkers". This pattern of helping "results in higher performance and in turn promotability of high caste workers".
This is the internalisation of hierarchy. The low-caste individual has learned, through a lifetime of exposure, that the high-caste individual is more worthy of help, more deserving of support, more likely to succeed. And they act on that learning, even when it works against their own interest. The hierarchy is not imposed from above. It is reproduced from below. The prisoner has become the jailer.
3.7 Welfare and the Loosening of Caste Bonds
There is a counter-narrative. A 2025 study in the American Political Science Review, based on panel data on household loans and survey data from 3,020 households, examined the impact of welfare on inter-caste relations. The findings were significant. "An income support program reduced within-caste borrowing by 38.5%". "Welfare enhanced intercaste ties, mainly in areas with lower caste-based land inequality". The mechanism is economic. When individuals are less dependent on their caste group for survival, they are more free to form ties across caste lines. The architecture of caste is not just psychological. It is material. It is sustained by the necessity of mutual aid within the group. When that necessity is reduced, the walls begin to crumble.
4. Discussion
The evidence tells a consistent story. Caste in contemporary India is not a matter of belief. It is a matter of performance. It is a social architecture that compels conformity through the fear of sanctions and the weight of family obligation. It operates through the micro-interactions of daily life—the sideways glance, the withheld congratulation, the assumption of fraudulence. It produces chronic trauma, despair, and self-harm. It reproduces itself through the internalisation of hierarchy, where the low-caste individual learns to favour the high-caste other. But it is not immutable. The research points toward the conditions under which the architecture can be loosened.
4.1 Freud and the Return of the Repressed
Sigmund Freud's concept of the return of the repressed offers a framework for understanding the persistence of caste. Freud argued that repressed material—unacceptable desires, traumatic memories, forbidden impulses—does not disappear. It returns. It erupts in symptoms, in slips of the tongue, in dreams, and in collective behaviour.
Caste is the return of a history that India has tried to repress. The constitution declared equality. The law abolished untouchability. The official narrative proclaimed a new nation, free of the old hierarchies. But the repressed returned. It returned in the sideways glances of the university corridor. It returned in the ambivalent stereotypes of the south. It returned in the outgroup favoritism of the workplace. It returned in the self-harm of the Dalit student who could no longer bear the weight of being seen as less than.
The return of the repressed is not a failure of the individual. It is a failure of the collective to confront its own history. The nation has not mourned its caste past. It has not acknowledged the trauma. It has not made amends. And so the past returns, again and again, in the bodies and minds of those who bear its weight.
4.2 Kant and the Ethics of Autonomy
Immanuel Kant's philosophy of autonomy offers a corrective. For Kant, freedom is the capacity to act according to reason rather than being determined by external forces. The individual who performs maryada out of fear of sanctions is not free. They are heteronomous. They are determined by the social scrutiny of their environment, by the anticipated punishment of their family, by the weight of a tradition they may not even believe in.
Kant's concept of the sensus communis—the shared sense that makes community possible—explains what caste destroys. In his Critique of Judgment, Kant argued that thinking requires community. But the community that is structured by caste is not a community of thinkers. It is a community of performers. Each person plays their role, not because they believe in the script, but because the cost of improvisation is too high. The sensus communis is fractured by the very hierarchy that claims to organise it.
4.3 Clinical and Policy Implications
For mental health professionals, the implications are clear.
The first is assessment. Clinicians working with Dalit clients must assess not just individual symptoms but the social architecture of caste. Is the client performing maryada? Are they experiencing everyday discrimination? Are they internalising the hierarchy? These questions reveal the structural conditions that shape mental health.
The second is validation. The Dalit client who describes the subtle erosion of their merit, the sideways glances, the unspoken disbelief, is not imagining things. They are describing a real phenomenon, documented by empirical research. The clinician must validate this experience. The pain is real. The trauma is real.
The third is community. Individual therapy cannot solve a structural problem. The research on role-model priming and welfare suggests that the architecture can be loosened. Community-level interventions—mentorship programs, economic support that reduces dependence on caste networks, inter-caste contact initiatives—are necessary.
The fourth is advocacy. Mental health professionals have a role in shaping the conditions that produce mental health. Policies that reduce caste-based inequality, that enforce anti-discrimination laws, that support Dalit students in universities—these are not just political acts. They are mental health acts.
4.4 Limitations
The evidence base has limitations. Much of the research on caste behaviour is ethnographic or experimental, and the ecological validity of laboratory findings is not always clear. The research on mental health outcomes is growing but remains fragmented. And the Indian research, while increasingly sophisticated, is still less developed than the Western literature on intergroup relations.
4.4 Future Directions
Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies that track the psychological consequences of caste performance over time. Studies that evaluate the effectiveness of interventions—both clinical and structural—in reducing the trauma of caste. And research that explores the conditions under which the architecture of caste can be dismantled, rather than merely loosened.
5. Conclusion
A young man enters a university. He has secured the first rank. He expects recognition. He receives silence. And in that silence, a thousand years of history are condensed into a single moment of unspoken disbelief.
We do not have a problem with anyone. But data is data, and truth is truth. Caste is not dead. It is performed. It is performed in the sideways glance, in the withheld congratulation, in the assumption of fraudulence. It is performed by people who do not believe in it, because the cost of not performing is too high. And it kills. It kills through the chronic trauma of discrimination, through the despair of unseeability, through the self-harm of those who can no longer bear the weight.
The path forward is not easy. It requires not just the transformation of law, but the transformation of the social architecture that compels performance. It requires not just the education of the mind, but the healing of the psyche. It requires the courage to confront the repressed, to mourn the past, to build a community where the sensus communis is not fractured by hierarchy.
The first step is to see. To see the performance. To see the trauma. To recognise the humanity that the architecture of caste has rendered invisible.
6. References
· Bhoi, D. (2026). Mentality and psychological construction of cast(ed) social in making of caste village: Dalits affective encounters in university space. National Identities, 1–33.
· Bhoi, D. (2025). Caste, mental health and self-harm: Emotive experiences of Dalit students at the Indian University. Contemporary South Asia, 33(4), 681–702.
· Dixit, A. G. (2025). The impact of welfare on intergroup relations: Caste-based social insurance and social integration in India. American Political Science Review.
· Iyer, P. K. (2023). The weight of tradition: Investigating the persistence and performance of caste and gender hierarchies in Indian society [PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science].
· Konda, B. (2026). Exploring the dynamics of social identity and social networks in shaping developmental outcomes: A case of rural India [PhD dissertation, United Nations University].
· Pathania, G., Jadhav, S., Thorat, A., Mosse, D., & Jain, S. (2023). Caste identities and structures of threats: Stigma, prejudice and social representation in Indian universities. CASTE: A Global Journal on Social Exclusion, 4(1), 3–23.
· Pitesa, M., & colleagues. (2023). Caste and class: Outgroup favoritism and inequality reproduction in the workplace. Academy of Management Proceedings.
· Prasad, A., Sockbeson, C. E. S., & O'Brien, L. T. (2024). Examining stereotypes in a dynamic social order: The stereotype content model in India. The Journal of Social Psychology, 164(3), 293–301.
· Sarkar, R., & Santhosh, J. (2025). Caste and emancipatory quest: Ethnography of Dalits in an urban neighborhood. Springer.
· Tiwari, S., Ścigała, K. A., Schild, C., & Zettler, I. (2022). Indian caste names and cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 489–503.
· Within-group inequality and caste-based crimes in India. (2026). Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
· Caste, mental health and self-harm: Emotive experiences of Dalit students at the Indian University. (2025). Contemporary South Asia, 33(4), 681–702.
Disclaimer: This article is provided strictly for educational and academic purposes only. It is not intended to serve as medical, psychological, or professional advice, and it should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of any mental health condition. All information is drawn from authentic research papers and published reports. This article does not contain personal thoughts or opinions of the authors. We do not have a problem with anyone. But data is data, and truth is truth. The authors have conducted research and analysis based solely on published materials. The author and publisher assume no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of this material.
Prepared by
Dr. Shekhar and Team
Psychology Doctor's Forum For All 🏥⚖️

Comments
Post a Comment